Register

Author Topic: Arkham Horror discussion/game setup  (Read 23840 times)

Yakumo

  • Moderator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1935
    • View Profile
Arkham Horror discussion/game setup
« on: November 13, 2009, 06:29:34 AM »
Well, the experiment of me running a game with Andy's parts seemed to work out fairly well, and Andy's apparently still really busy and can't put in the time to run a game of his own.  So, if people are interested, I'd be willing to run a second game.  This time I'd just use the official investigators/Ancient Ones, though, the Touhou ones could use a bit of re-balancing.  So, the question is, are people still interested enough to join another game?  If so, any preferences for expansions to be used?  I'd like to use at least one board and one card expansion.  Preferably not Dunwich since we've already used that twice, or Black Goat of the Woods since that was used once.  I actually kinda want to see Kingsport in action since I haven't seen that one yet but if everyone hates that idea we can do something else. >_>
« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 01:17:34 AM by Yakumo »

Shale

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5800
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2009, 03:12:47 PM »
Sounds like fun to me.
"Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology."
-Ponder Stibbons

[23:02] <Veryslightlymad> CK dreams about me starring in porno?
[23:02] <CmdrKing> Pretty sure.

Jo'ou Ranbu

  • Social Justice Steampunk Literature Character
  • New Age Retro Fucking Hipster
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 12981
  • Ah'm tuff fer mah size!
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2009, 03:13:33 PM »
As usual, more Arkham in the DLs is always a positive for me.
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> HEY
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> LAGGY
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> UVIET?!??!?!
[01:08] <Laggy> YA!!!!!!!!!1111111111
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> OMG!!!!
[01:08] <Chulianne> No wonder you're small.
[01:08] <TranceHime> cocks
[01:08] <Laggy> .....

Taishyr

  • Guest
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2009, 03:17:54 PM »
I'd be willing to actually -play- a game, this time.

Nitori

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1091
  • The only thing YOU'RE onto is your mot-
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2009, 03:31:06 PM »
I'm in
<Ko-NitoriisSulpher> roll 1d100 to grade Nitori?
<Hatbot> ACTION --> "Ko-NitoriisSulpher rolls 1d100 to grade Nitori? and gets 100." [1d100=100]

Random Consonant

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2189
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2009, 06:11:24 PM »
Sure, why not.

Sierra

  • N I G H T M A R E E Y E S
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5135
  • Go get dead, angel face
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2009, 07:00:26 PM »
I'd be glad to play in another game in the hope that I won't be totally useless next time (though with Hatbot involved, I am never optimistic).

Talaysen

  • Ara ara~
  • Administrator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2595
  • Ufufu~
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2009, 07:42:30 PM »
I'd play.

Strago

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 839
  • Scarfregist
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2009, 08:10:48 PM »
I'm definitely game. The Innsmouth investigators look particularly fun to me, so I'd be jazzed to use that expansion.

Ranmilia

  • Poetry Lover
  • Moderator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1687
  • Not a squid!!
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2009, 08:39:47 PM »
use Innsmouth
Use Innsmouth
USE INNSMOUTH

Yes.

Seriously though, use Innsmouth.  Kingsport is... okayish in conjuction with one or both other boards, but not a very exciting expansion on its own.  It adds a board full of stable locations which you really have no reason to ever visit except to keep rifts from opening, which in practice means you send the least competent investigator up there to mess around taking encounters and discovering that... none of them do anything very interesting.  Innsmouth's board is the exact same basic concept as Kingsport (new areas with a flimsy "visit occasionally or LOSE!" mechanic forcing you over there, high risk/reward remote area that takes multiple turns to get to...) but done 10x better.

Card expansions... Dark Pharaoh and Black Goat seem like they're just kinda there unless you actually use their heralds, as shown when Andy ran Black Goat and not too much stuff from it actually saw play.  King in Yellow is incredibly punishing if you do the topdecking we used at DLCon 3.  If run as a normal expansion it adds a bit of meat to the terror track, seems to have more impact than the other card expansions.    

I'd personally like to see either a big mashup with several expansions or a heavily themed game with a herald and maybe even some story and roleplaying, similar to the one that just finished.  But that's just me and there are... wow already eight people in line so yeah.

Jo'ou Ranbu

  • Social Justice Steampunk Literature Character
  • New Age Retro Fucking Hipster
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 12981
  • Ah'm tuff fer mah size!
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2009, 08:44:04 PM »
I won't necessarily play this time around, mind. I just had to chime in approval. I'd probably settle for a backup spot this time around.
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> HEY
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> LAGGY
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> UVIET?!??!?!
[01:08] <Laggy> YA!!!!!!!!!1111111111
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> OMG!!!!
[01:08] <Chulianne> No wonder you're small.
[01:08] <TranceHime> cocks
[01:08] <Laggy> .....

Yakumo

  • Moderator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1935
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2009, 09:04:40 PM »
All the locations in Kingsport are stable?  That's pointless.  Ah well.  Innsmouth doesn't sound like such a bad idea then.  Unless other people want to play with a larger set than just one board and one card?  Keep in mind that any boards past the first make the number of investigators count as one less than it actually is for purposes of things like the gate/monster limits, so if we wanted to do that we could conceivably handle more than six players without too many problems.

AndrewRogue

  • Infinite
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3079
  • Sadness
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2009, 09:29:25 PM »
Kingsport adds the rift threat which is relatively easy to manage, overall. It isn't a bad expansion, but it needs support to emerge as legitimately threatening.

I do not recommend more than six players. I've found that the sweet spot really is right around 4-6 for managing to be threatening without overwhelming or underwhelming.

If you run Innsmouth, I do not recommend using another expansion right away. Innsmouth is HARD. The board is brutal, the encounters are brutal, the GoOs are rude and the heralds are fairly cruel. About the only polite thing involved in it are the investigators, who are very good on the whole.

If using Innsmouth investigators, I generally recommend trimming out the easy base GoOs.

No matter what you decide, I do recommend using Epic Battles. Always better.

On the card expansions: CotDP is, as Alex says, pretty much there. It doesn't really ever do much. The exhibit items are okay and the only really threatening/stand out encounters are the 'Meet the proper GoO on their home turf' Other World Encounters.

King in Yellow is fairly solid and has a fair amount of presence. The amount it threatens varies based on shuffling, but it does its job, even when mingled.

Black Goat is actually a lot meaner than Alex credits it. Although cult membership (and, by extension, corruptions) can be pretty low key, the encounters and such provided can get pretty mean, and the Black Goat itself is not funny.

Hunter Sopko

  • Heavily in Debt
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4556
  • Hai, Kazuma-desu
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2009, 10:12:51 PM »
I'm game.

Magetastic

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 600
  • Cooler than you.
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2009, 12:36:56 AM »
If there's still room, I'm down to play again.
<%King_Meepdorah> roll 1d999 for "It was beauty...that killed the mage"?
* +Hatbot --> "King_Meepdorah rolls 1d999 for "It was beauty...that killed the mage"? and gets 999."12 [1d999=999]
<%King_Meepdorah> ...
<+superaway> ...Uh oh.
<+RandomConsonant> ...
* +superaway shakes head.

VySaika

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2836
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2009, 02:43:32 AM »
I would totally be up for another game, but will sit this next one out as I just played, of course. More Arkham is good though~
<%Laggy> we're open minded individuals here
<+RandomKesaranPasaran> are we
<%Laggy> no not really.

<Tide|NukicommentatoroptionforF> Hatbot is a pacifist

Yakumo

  • Moderator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1935
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2009, 03:03:28 AM »
Well, we certainly have enough interest, but does anyone other than Alex have any opinion whatsoever on which parts to use?

Nitori

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1091
  • The only thing YOU'RE onto is your mot-
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2009, 03:10:54 AM »
I haven't seen King in Yellow yet so I'd like to see that~
<Ko-NitoriisSulpher> roll 1d100 to grade Nitori?
<Hatbot> ACTION --> "Ko-NitoriisSulpher rolls 1d100 to grade Nitori? and gets 100." [1d100=100]

Sierra

  • N I G H T M A R E E Y E S
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5135
  • Go get dead, angel face
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2009, 03:27:47 AM »
Well, we certainly have enough interest, but does anyone other than Alex have any opinion whatsoever on which parts to use?

No preference, really, since I don't know much about any of them.

Taishyr

  • Guest
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2009, 03:28:09 AM »
I don't, particularly; I'm cool with Yellow/Innsmouth or something like that.

Random Consonant

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2189
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2009, 03:32:45 AM »
*shrug* While I'd like to see Kingsport, it doesn't look like that's going to happen, so yeah, I'm cool with KiY/Innsmouth.

Hunter Sopko

  • Heavily in Debt
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4556
  • Hai, Kazuma-desu
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #21 on: November 14, 2009, 03:36:30 AM »
::Needs to finish his recurring GoO so a Kingsport game could be relevent!::

King in Yellow/Innsmouth sounds absolutely smashing.

Talaysen

  • Ara ara~
  • Administrator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2595
  • Ufufu~
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #22 on: November 14, 2009, 04:05:29 AM »
Don't know any of the expansions so don't really care.  New stuff is good though.

Yakumo

  • Moderator
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1935
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #23 on: November 14, 2009, 04:38:27 AM »
Innsmouth board with King in Yellow seems to be the general consensus.  We'll have six players.  I'll use the whole investigator pool and give everyone that gets in two options like I did last time.  I'll let Hatbot decide who gets in, better odds given to people that have been out longer, people that were in the game that just got finished excluded since we have a lot of people that've been sitting on the sidelines.  So far this looks like the list of possible players:

Tai, who hasn't been in a game here yet.
Nitori, Shale, Strago, Alex, and Soppy, who played in the first game.
Random and Tal, who played in the second.
Snow was also in the second game, do you want to be in the running or do you want to just stay in a backup role for now?

I'll probably start rolling stuff out tomorrow evening so we can get rolling fairly soon, so if anyone else wants a chance to get in speak up and I'll toss your name in the mixer too.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2009, 04:53:47 AM by Yakumo »

Nitori

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1091
  • The only thing YOU'RE onto is your mot-
    • View Profile
Re: More Arkham?
« Reply #24 on: November 14, 2009, 04:45:07 AM »
I was in the first game, not the second~!
<Ko-NitoriisSulpher> roll 1d100 to grade Nitori?
<Hatbot> ACTION --> "Ko-NitoriisSulpher rolls 1d100 to grade Nitori? and gets 100." [1d100=100]